Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:16:06 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 13:55:50, Chessfun wrote: > > >Definately all valid points as are; >1. How many games would it take to find a "win" v a GM using 2. Na3!? > I don't believe that would ever happen. >2. If he let you have any takebacks could you still win any?. I would doubt it. That would let you eliminate N tactical errors, but would that be enough? I don't think so unless the GM's opponent is _very_ strong himself... > >3. If you managed a win with 50 takebacks v a GM could that be repeated :-) > That is _the_ issue. Probably not. Which is one weakness machines have that is _really_ overlooked. >Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.