Author: Antonio Dieguez
Date: 11:30:12 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 13:56:19, Marc van Hal wrote: >There are lot of GM's with a rating of 2600 which never would make a change >against the programs. >(If there was no spying before the game!) >Then again if Kasparov would have performed all the time like chessprograms do. >I would not be as much impressed by his play. >Something which should be looked for to improve this is putting in the knowledge >of what is a winning position. >What is a clear plus >What is a small plus >What is a small disadvantage >What is a clear disadvantage >What is a lost position. > >And how to play in these type of positions > >Simply one of the basics of chess strategy! > >At the moment this is solved Computers are not GM's but super super GM's! > >I look to much at Dragon ball Z perhaps HEHE. then it's not "super super GM's" but "super GM's 2" or "super GM's level 2". >Marc van Hal
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.