Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 11:35:25 06/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2001 at 14:30:12, Antonio Dieguez wrote: >On June 26, 2001 at 13:56:19, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>There are lot of GM's with a rating of 2600 which never would make a change >>against the programs. >>(If there was no spying before the game!) >>Then again if Kasparov would have performed all the time like chessprograms do. >>I would not be as much impressed by his play. >>Something which should be looked for to improve this is putting in the knowledge >>of what is a winning position. >>What is a clear plus >>What is a small plus >>What is a small disadvantage >>What is a clear disadvantage >>What is a lost position. >> >>And how to play in these type of positions >> >>Simply one of the basics of chess strategy! >> >>At the moment this is solved Computers are not GM's but super super GM's! >> >>I look to much at Dragon ball Z perhaps HEHE. > >then it's not "super super GM's" but "super GM's 2" or "super GM's level 2". I heard Kasparov has a Kamaya-maya or something to use against computers.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.