Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 07:08:50 06/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 2001 at 04:58:38, Harald Faber wrote: >Another Tiger-Shredder-match is completed, and Tiger stays unbeaten against >Shredder. The result is 6-4, but honestly one can say that it has been an equal >match, only the last two games made the decision for Tiger from 4-4 to 6-4. I >missed Shredder's endgame capabilities in those games. While Tiger showed clear >advantage for several moves, Shredder needed some more moves to correct the 0.00 >evaluation which do not seem to have been correct. Surprising, I expected >something better from Shredder, but it strengthens my point of view that Tiger >dominates the endgame and even the highly reputated endgame specialist Shredder >has to accept that. >Games available at http://www.geocities.com/Harald1312/HaraldFaberE.html > >Next round will be Tiger vs. Century 3, assuming I will get the autoplayer to >work properly, under Win98 it didn't, so if I ever get it to work on the other >machine under Win95b, Tiger will run on the K7-500. > >Latest findings show that the Shredder 5.32 - book (with some holes e.g. the >sicilian morra is out of book for black after 1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3) is exactly >the same as the ChessBase-Tiger-book. Source is a posting in the ChessBits >Forum. Well, I don't want to comment on that... From the same source it looks like the ChessBase-Tiger-Shredder5.32-book is simply compiled of games with players >2400 ELO. You can very easy make such a book yourself, at home. Sune
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.