Author: Côme
Date: 12:04:12 06/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 2001 at 14:59:56, Mark Young wrote:
>On June 27, 2001 at 14:54:49, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>
>>On June 27, 2001 at 14:43:44, Mark Young wrote:
>>
>>>On June 27, 2001 at 14:17:30, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 27, 2001 at 13:24:45, Mark Young wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On June 27, 2001 at 13:09:56, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On June 27, 2001 at 12:45:24, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I post only my fantastical games....and "I'm happy"!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Ok.?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Best wishes,
>>>>>>>Eduard
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi Eduard,
>>>>>>Hi Mark,
>>>>>>I think that Eduard discovering about weak points or "bad moves" can be very
>>>>>>helpful for the chess programs developers community because they can learn the
>>>>>>lesson and fix the weak points of the programs, like in this case Shredder.
>>>>>>So I think that the contribution of Eduard is welcome as a "tester" of the
>>>>>>computer creatures.
>>>>>
>>>>>The programs have the weaknesses at the time controls he is playing at, but so
>>>>>what, this is not news to any programmer.
>>>>>
>>>>>He is playing tricks, do it over the board at 40/2 under tournament conditions.
>>>>>He can't do it, unless he knows the programs book, but if you change the way the
>>>>>program played a slight bit he would be lost again. For Eduard to win, he must
>>>>>expolit the computer openness.
>>>>>
>>>>>Have Eduard play Crafty on ICC, and win a match, because Crafty will not lose to
>>>>>this crap in match play.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Keep up the good work Eduard.
>>>>
>>>>Hi!
>>>>
>>>>See this posting for You and say your opinion, Ok!!
>>>>
>>>>I play no Online-Chess in CCC - Why? But play "live" !
>>>>Here my posting for You:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"In ICC on-line chess I do not know myself yet out. Those are for me in
>>>>addition, no normal play conditions. I would play however very gladly a " duel "
>>>>against GM, on level lightning 5 ', 24 portions and on lightning 30 ', 10
>>>>portions. That also almost folded it in January 2001, should in the region
>>>>Stuttgart take place. I had a sponsor at that time already for it, and a German
>>>>computer journal offered likewise a money on (GM does not play if he no cash for
>>>>it receives!). I called the magazine (so they wanted to have it) accurate date
>>>>and place, and was adjusted to it had to be played. The responsible of that
>>>>magazine however did not want to accept my conditions (" that is too easily for
>>>>me like that ", said it). My condition was: 14 days before the match I should
>>>>have the original CD including book and program! The program can learn or? -)
>>>>One offered with the following conditions (eMail I have still, think I):
>>>>1. Another place (700 km away from me)
>>>>2. the program version I may not know
>>>>3. the initialization book would be likewise prepared
>>>>4. GM wanted the magazine to place
>>>>5. I may some hours at the PC practice, more not I rejected in such a way.
>>>>
>>>>I wanted to play " only " against an available PC version including book. Also
>>>>the place specified by me was ok one, because it would have become a " public
>>>>event ". At the place which I had suggested, took place "maemlich" a large open
>>>>- one of the largest open of Germany! Who there too had cowardly been? I am safe
>>>>that I in the PC duel against of GM (or IN) good chances would have had to win,
>>>>because I was very well "drauf". Unfortunate that it did not fold.
>>>>
>>>>Correction:
>>>>
>>>>1. It should be obviously a Computer duell
>>>>
>>>>2. (" that is too easily for me like that ", said it) - - > that is not a
>>>>quotation from eMail separates only summarized words in a general manner! It
>>>>concerned it that I not too easily to have should with killer courses!
>>>>
>>>>3. I already knew the program, however I was not allowed to know the version
>>>>number of the program!
>>>>
>>>>4. " my schedule " (January 2001) did not fit the magazine, therefore the match
>>>>should take place elsewhere and in former times (to training I would have then
>>>>however no time had).
>>>>
>>>>Eduard Nemeth
>>>
>>>Training....Just jump online a play Crafty some games, remember you said its
>>>easy, I say its hard....so prove it when you do not control the program then win
>>>a match....I say you can't and/or won't do it. You know the outcome as well as
>>>I...Crafty wins.
>>
>>I played not online-chess but I played many years in chess-club, and in the
>>chess-club I played "live" against human "and against computer too"!
>>
>>When I can "live" play against computer, than is this for me Ok.
>>and very interesting than this makes me happy - but online chess not.
>>You can for You online-chess play but, please let me "my chess" play. Ok.?
>
>
>How convenient for you……I sure it has nothing to do with you not being able to
>control the outcome of game…….What ever. I must be a profit because I knew you
>would refuse to back up your claims.
>
>
>>
>>Best wishes,
>>Eduard
Hello !
Why do you attack Eduard ?
You think games he post are somewhat fixed or manipulated ?
Crafty is not invicible you know, it is beatable even at blitz.
Best regards
Alexandre Côme
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.