Author: Côme
Date: 12:07:41 06/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 2001 at 15:06:33, Mark Young wrote:
>On June 27, 2001 at 15:04:12, Côme wrote:
>
>>On June 27, 2001 at 14:59:56, Mark Young wrote:
>>
>>>On June 27, 2001 at 14:54:49, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 27, 2001 at 14:43:44, Mark Young wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On June 27, 2001 at 14:17:30, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On June 27, 2001 at 13:24:45, Mark Young wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On June 27, 2001 at 13:09:56, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On June 27, 2001 at 12:45:24, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I post only my fantastical games....and "I'm happy"!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Ok.?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Best wishes,
>>>>>>>>>Eduard
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hi Eduard,
>>>>>>>>Hi Mark,
>>>>>>>>I think that Eduard discovering about weak points or "bad moves" can be very
>>>>>>>>helpful for the chess programs developers community because they can learn the
>>>>>>>>lesson and fix the weak points of the programs, like in this case Shredder.
>>>>>>>>So I think that the contribution of Eduard is welcome as a "tester" of the
>>>>>>>>computer creatures.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The programs have the weaknesses at the time controls he is playing at, but so
>>>>>>>what, this is not news to any programmer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>He is playing tricks, do it over the board at 40/2 under tournament conditions.
>>>>>>>He can't do it, unless he knows the programs book, but if you change the way the
>>>>>>>program played a slight bit he would be lost again. For Eduard to win, he must
>>>>>>>expolit the computer openness.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Have Eduard play Crafty on ICC, and win a match, because Crafty will not lose to
>>>>>>>this crap in match play.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Keep up the good work Eduard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>See this posting for You and say your opinion, Ok!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I play no Online-Chess in CCC - Why? But play "live" !
>>>>>>Here my posting for You:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"In ICC on-line chess I do not know myself yet out. Those are for me in
>>>>>>addition, no normal play conditions. I would play however very gladly a " duel "
>>>>>>against GM, on level lightning 5 ', 24 portions and on lightning 30 ', 10
>>>>>>portions. That also almost folded it in January 2001, should in the region
>>>>>>Stuttgart take place. I had a sponsor at that time already for it, and a German
>>>>>>computer journal offered likewise a money on (GM does not play if he no cash for
>>>>>>it receives!). I called the magazine (so they wanted to have it) accurate date
>>>>>>and place, and was adjusted to it had to be played. The responsible of that
>>>>>>magazine however did not want to accept my conditions (" that is too easily for
>>>>>>me like that ", said it). My condition was: 14 days before the match I should
>>>>>>have the original CD including book and program! The program can learn or? -)
>>>>>>One offered with the following conditions (eMail I have still, think I):
>>>>>>1. Another place (700 km away from me)
>>>>>>2. the program version I may not know
>>>>>>3. the initialization book would be likewise prepared
>>>>>>4. GM wanted the magazine to place
>>>>>>5. I may some hours at the PC practice, more not I rejected in such a way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I wanted to play " only " against an available PC version including book. Also
>>>>>>the place specified by me was ok one, because it would have become a " public
>>>>>>event ". At the place which I had suggested, took place "maemlich" a large open
>>>>>>- one of the largest open of Germany! Who there too had cowardly been? I am safe
>>>>>>that I in the PC duel against of GM (or IN) good chances would have had to win,
>>>>>>because I was very well "drauf". Unfortunate that it did not fold.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Correction:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>1. It should be obviously a Computer duell
>>>>>>
>>>>>>2. (" that is too easily for me like that ", said it) - - > that is not a
>>>>>>quotation from eMail separates only summarized words in a general manner! It
>>>>>>concerned it that I not too easily to have should with killer courses!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>3. I already knew the program, however I was not allowed to know the version
>>>>>>number of the program!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>4. " my schedule " (January 2001) did not fit the magazine, therefore the match
>>>>>>should take place elsewhere and in former times (to training I would have then
>>>>>>however no time had).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Eduard Nemeth
>>>>>
>>>>>Training....Just jump online a play Crafty some games, remember you said its
>>>>>easy, I say its hard....so prove it when you do not control the program then win
>>>>>a match....I say you can't and/or won't do it. You know the outcome as well as
>>>>>I...Crafty wins.
>>>>
>>>>I played not online-chess but I played many years in chess-club, and in the
>>>>chess-club I played "live" against human "and against computer too"!
>>>>
>>>>When I can "live" play against computer, than is this for me Ok.
>>>>and very interesting than this makes me happy - but online chess not.
>>>>You can for You online-chess play but, please let me "my chess" play. Ok.?
>>>
>>>
>>>How convenient for you……I sure it has nothing to do with you not being able to
>>>control the outcome of game…….What ever. I must be a profit because I knew you
>>>would refuse to back up your claims.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Best wishes,
>>>>Eduard
>>
>>Hello !
>>Why do you attack Eduard ?
>>You think games he post are somewhat fixed or manipulated ?
>>Crafty is not invicible you know, it is beatable even at blitz.
>>Best regards
>>Alexandre Côme
>
>
>Sure it is, but not by a player of his skill level when he can not control the
>outcome....THAT IS THE POINT.
How do you know his skill level ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.