Author: Pham Minh Tri
Date: 20:00:59 06/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 2001 at 12:25:02, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On June 26, 2001 at 12:43:39, Pham Minh Tri wrote: > >>[snip] >>>>>So for the loss of speed you get back a more efficient search besides >>>>>a better eval (that last of course still is hard work)! >>>> >>>>But I guess attacktables do not help move order much, so instead of them, >>> >>>May i beg your pardon? >>[snip] >> >>I think, after hash, captures, killers, history moves, now attacktables have a >>chance to contribute, for example, help some pieces to escape. As a result, they >>could not help much. > >Beginner. You are totally true!!! However, I forgot to say that I use SEE for sorting captures. This must be better than use of attacktables, so I still think they have later chances to improve move order. BTW, I will think carefully about their abilities. Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.