Author: Chessfun
Date: 20:18:13 06/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 2001 at 18:42:37, Martin Schubert wrote: >On June 27, 2001 at 16:18:45, Mark Young wrote: > >>On June 27, 2001 at 16:11:37, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On June 27, 2001 at 15:22:06, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>What my "Real identity"? :) >>> >>>I couldn't care less about your identity. Just another troll without substance. >>> >>>>Then don't make claims you can't backup... >>> >>>That wasn't the case. You invented claims on his behalf. So far Eduard has >>>backed every word with sufficient evidence. None of your messages has suffered >>>from that so far. >> >>I made no claims, I was told to "check with Edaurd!" I did....and nothing he >>has shown or said proves anything. So no need to check with Edaurd anymore, or >>bring him up as proving some point. >> >>> >>>Mogens. > >Nothing you ever said proves anything. You want other people to prove everything >but you can't prove anything. You can just look at some numbers and say: an >average GM has rating x, Tiger plays rating y. Because y is bigger than x, Tiger >has GM strenght. Does this kind of argumentation prove anything? It seems to for some. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.