Author: Tony Werten
Date: 01:28:10 06/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 2001 at 10:56:24, William H Rogers wrote: >It never ceases to amaze me how a small handful of people who may or may not >have ever gone to college or even studied advance computer science and make >statements that are 100% the opposite of some of the worlds greatest minds from >all over the world have stated. The top great thinkers from almost every >university in the world have defined A.I. and what it is suppost to do and yet >there are a few young people here would match their intelligence againts theirs. >Maybe the Harvard, Yale, Stanford, or people at M.I.T.s should look into getting >rid of all of their Phd's and call you guys. >A.I., as it has been losely defined is the ability of a device to solve or make >decisions regarding a specific problem. How the machine was designed or >programmed is not the point, it is what it does afterward when it is turned on >and ran. >Not trying to stir up more waves, but I have studied this matter for years. >If you disagree, good, but just don't rewrite the worlds greatest accepted >facts. This misunderstanding appears every now and then. The abbility to come to the same results as humans do every now and then isn't enough. Now it has come to the same idea with the same thinking process as well. Let's turn it around. Computers are more intelligent than humans. How smart would you be with 220 volts up your butt ? Tony >Bill
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.