Author: Tony Werten
Date: 01:37:53 06/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 2001 at 23:00:59, Pham Minh Tri wrote: >On June 27, 2001 at 12:25:02, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On June 26, 2001 at 12:43:39, Pham Minh Tri wrote: >> >>>[snip] >>>>>>So for the loss of speed you get back a more efficient search besides >>>>>>a better eval (that last of course still is hard work)! >>>>> >>>>>But I guess attacktables do not help move order much, so instead of them, >>>> >>>>May i beg your pardon? >>>[snip] >>> >>>I think, after hash, captures, killers, history moves, now attacktables have a >>>chance to contribute, for example, help some pieces to escape. As a result, they >>>could not help much. >> >>Beginner. > >You are totally true!!! > >However, I forgot to say that I use SEE for sorting captures. This must be >better than use of attacktables, so I still think they have later chances to >improve move order. BTW, I will think carefully about their abilities. Thanks. Eh, shouldn't attacktables be used for your SEE sorting ? Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.