Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:22:13 06/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2001 at 22:29:21, K. Burcham wrote: > > > > >[Site "mainz germany"] >[Date "27/6/2001"] >[Round "game 3"] >[White "anand"] >[Black "kramnik"] >[Result "0-1"] >[WhiteElo "2794"] >[BlackElo "2802"] >[Opening "C67 Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Open Variation"] > >1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.O-O Nxe4 5.d4 Nd6 6.Bxc6 dxc6 7.dxe5 Nf5 8.Qxd8+ >Kxd8 9.Nc3 >h6 10.h3 Bd7 11.b3 Kc8 12.Bb2 b6 13.Rad1 Ne7 14.Rd2 c5 15.Rfd1 Be6 16.Ne2 g5 >17.h4 g4 18.Nh2 >h5 19.Rd8+ Kb7 20.Rxa8 Kxa8 21.Rd8+ Kb7 22.Nf4 Ng6 23.g3 c4 24.bxc4 Nxf4 25.gxf4 >g3 26.Nf1 >gxf2+ 27.Kh2 Bxc4 0-1 > > > > >shredder 5 eval shows white up +.66 depth 18 >with 24. Nxe6 > >gambit tiger eval shows white up +.10 depth 20 >with 24. Nxe6 > > >anand played 24. bxc4 > > >shredder 5 eval shows black up -2.44 depth 18 >with 24. bxc4 > > >gambit tiger eval shows black up -2.50 depth 20 >with 24. bxc4 Shredder5 and gambittiger do some processing in the root so it is better not to use their evaluations to learn about blunders. Difference of more than 2.5 is usually a blunder inspite of it but if you like to learn about blunders based on the difference in the evaluation there are better programs: 1)Junior7 2)Gandlf4.32h 3)yace Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.