Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:10:45 06/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 2001 at 10:36:59, James T. Walker wrote: >"The majority has no qualifications to answer that question. The fact that >Chess >programs can beat the crap out of me and most people here, doesn't even come >close to making them GM strength. > >Pete" > >Gee Pete, >Why didn't you tell me I was not qualified before I went and answered the poll? >By the way, what qualifies you to tell me I'm not qualified? Also it's only an >opinion poll so in my opinion no particular qualifications are required to vote >your opinion. I don't think it has been represented as a scientific study of >any sorts either. An opinion poll is simply that. Just opinions based on >whatever your personal opinion is and nothing more. Most people have opinions >about things which they are not "experts". I suspect you do too. >Regards, >Jim There's nothing wrong with anyone answering the poll. Just as there is nothing wrong with answering the poll question "Does a quark have mass?" If the majority says yes or no, that doesn't affect the real answer at all, of course.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.