Author: James T. Walker
Date: 06:38:27 06/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 2001 at 22:10:45, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On June 29, 2001 at 10:36:59, James T. Walker wrote: > >>"The majority has no qualifications to answer that question. The fact that >>Chess >>programs can beat the crap out of me and most people here, doesn't even come >>close to making them GM strength. >> >>Pete" >> >>Gee Pete, >>Why didn't you tell me I was not qualified before I went and answered the poll? >>By the way, what qualifies you to tell me I'm not qualified? Also it's only an >>opinion poll so in my opinion no particular qualifications are required to vote >>your opinion. I don't think it has been represented as a scientific study of >>any sorts either. An opinion poll is simply that. Just opinions based on >>whatever your personal opinion is and nothing more. Most people have opinions >>about things which they are not "experts". I suspect you do too. >>Regards, >>Jim > > >There's nothing wrong with anyone answering the poll. Just as there is >nothing wrong with answering the poll question "Does a quark have mass?" > >If the majority says yes or no, that doesn't affect the real answer at all, >of course. Hello Bob, I agree 100% of course. I'm curious as to why you addressed your remarks to me?? Regards, Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.