Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:08:25 06/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 30, 2001 at 09:38:27, James T. Walker wrote: >On June 29, 2001 at 22:10:45, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On June 29, 2001 at 10:36:59, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>"The majority has no qualifications to answer that question. The fact that >>>Chess >>>programs can beat the crap out of me and most people here, doesn't even come >>>close to making them GM strength. >>> >>>Pete" >>> >>>Gee Pete, >>>Why didn't you tell me I was not qualified before I went and answered the poll? >>>By the way, what qualifies you to tell me I'm not qualified? Also it's only an >>>opinion poll so in my opinion no particular qualifications are required to vote >>>your opinion. I don't think it has been represented as a scientific study of >>>any sorts either. An opinion poll is simply that. Just opinions based on >>>whatever your personal opinion is and nothing more. Most people have opinions >>>about things which they are not "experts". I suspect you do too. >>>Regards, >>>Jim >> >> >>There's nothing wrong with anyone answering the poll. Just as there is >>nothing wrong with answering the poll question "Does a quark have mass?" >> >>If the majority says yes or no, that doesn't affect the real answer at all, >>of course. > >Hello Bob, >I agree 100% of course. I'm curious as to why you addressed your remarks to >me?? >Regards, >Jim I didn't. Ther eis no easy way to write comments to the "thread"... they always follow something somebody wrote. Assuming they are directed right at you is a mistake. You have to read to see if the follow-up comments appear to be directed at something you said, or just to the thread in general. In my case, the latter was correct.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.