Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:30:57 07/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On June 30, 2001 at 23:02:52, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On June 30, 2001 at 17:17:41, Fernando Villegas wrote: > >>Hi: >>If you look at the ganme Adams won to Pocket Fritz, you will concur that we are >>facing a program that, at least in this game, left the human side to kill him as >>a child. The most elemental king attack I have seen in years and nevertheles >>went OK. Blacks messing around in the queen side with no idea what to do as >>amads prepared the knife. Not even elemental defensives moves to prevent what >>was clearly coming with the obvious machine bishop-queen in the diagonal. >>Sorry, but I have a Fidelity old piece of plastic that plays better than that... >>Fernando > > >You sound surprised. If you take a program that plays well at 1000K nodes >per second, and run it on hardware where it can only search 1K nodes per >second, what would you logically expect to happen? It will play with 1/1000th >the skill (or even worse). I do not believe that it is 1/1000 of the speed. I understood that the speed is clearly better than the palm so I guess that is even more than 1/100 of the speed. I understood that the speed of the pocket PC is similiar to p100. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.