Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 09:30:40 07/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 2001 at 12:06:09, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >Somebody stated that in Chess it's more important the tactics (let's say 90%), >and I am pretty convinced about it. That doesn't change the fact that the tactical possibilities are different from position to position. Some of which are easier to handle for humans and some that are not. The strategy is to reach is to reach the former. Noone said it was easy. Especially with the attempts at anti-GM features you mention yourself. >Nowadays many programs have anti-gm features that nullify the anti-computer >strategy. I sincerely doubt that "nullify" is correct. A reduction of possibilities is more like it. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.