Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: GM vs GM game at ICC----score jumps 6.18 points in one move

Author: Chessfun

Date: 14:00:15 07/01/01

Go up one level in this thread


On July 01, 2001 at 16:49:34, K. Burcham wrote:

>[Event "?"]
>[Site "ICC"]
>[Date "30/6/2001"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "daggi (GM)"]
>[Black "maradona (GM)"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[WhiteElo "2704"]
>[BlackElo "2732"]
>[Opening "C46 Four Knights Game"]
>
>1.e4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.g3 Bc5 5.Bg2 d6 6.h3 Be6 7.O-O h6 8.d3 Qd7 9.Kh2
>a6 10.Be3 g5
>11.d4 exd4 12.Nxd4 Ne5 13.Nxe6 Qxe6 14.Bxc5 dxc5 15.f4 gxf4 16.gxf4 Nc6 17.e5
>Nd7 18.Bd5
>Qg6 19.f5 Qg5 20.e6 fxe6 21.Ne4 Qh4 22.fxe6 Nde5 23.e7 Kxe7 24.Bxc6 bxc6 25.Qe2
>Rhg8 26.Rg1
>Qf4+ 27.Kh1 Raf8 28.Raf1 Rxg1+ 29.Rxg1 Kd8 30.Nxc5 Qf5 31.Rd1+ Ke7 32.Qe3 Qf3+
>33.Qxf3
>Rxf3 34.Kg2 Rf4 35.Nxa6 Ra4 36.Nc5 Rxa2 37.Rb1 Kd6 38.Ne4+ Kd5 39.Nc3+ 1-0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>in this position, chess tiger has score 0 at depth 17
>
> [D] 8/2p5/2pk3p/4n3/4N3/7P/rPP3K1/1R6 b - - 8 1
>
>next move maradona plays Kd5
>with an instant jump in score of 6.30
>
>amazing the blunders we see the GMs play--but you have to admit--there are 1200
>rated players that would not make this move.
>
>just interesting to watch some of these terrible games played by our top players
>with all the talk about comparing them to our programs.
>
>
>  [D] 8/2p5/2p4p/3kn3/4N3/7P/rPP3K1/1R6 w - - 8 1

daggi (2721) vs. maradona (2715) --- 2001.07.01 15:52:42
Rated blitz match, initial time: 3 minutes, increment: 3 seconds

Move  daggi              maradona
----  ----------------   ----------------
  1.  e4       (0:06)    e5       (0:07)
  2.  Nc3      (0:04)    Nf6      (0:04)
  3.  Nf3      (0:02)    Nc6      (0:04)
  4.  g3       (0:01)    Bc5      (0:05)
  5.  Bg2      (0:02)    d6       (0:01)
  6.  h3       (0:04)    Be6      (0:06)
  7.  O-O      (0:02)    h6       (0:01)
  8.  d3       (0:10)    Qd7      (0:01)
  9.  Kh2      (0:05)    a6       (0:02)
 10.  Be3      (0:04)    g5       (0:06)
 11.  d4       (0:02)    exd4     (0:06)
 12.  Nxd4     (0:01)    Ne5      (0:23)
 13.  Nxe6     (0:43)    Qxe6     (0:03)
 14.  Bxc5     (0:09)    dxc5     (0:02)
 15.  f4       (0:02)    gxf4     (0:02)
 16.  gxf4     (0:02)    Nc6      (0:05)
 17.  e5       (0:03)    Nd7      (0:09)
 18.  Bd5      (0:35)    Qg6      (0:07)
 19.  f5       (0:14)    Qg5      (0:05)
 20.  e6       (0:07)    fxe6     (0:02)
 21.  Ne4      (0:12)    Qh4      (0:03)
 22.  fxe6     (0:04)    Nde5     (0:05)
 23.  e7       (0:24)    Kxe7     (0:17)
 24.  Bxc6     (0:08)    bxc6     (0:07)
 25.  Qe2      (0:04)    Rhg8     (0:16)
 26.  Rg1      (0:41)    Qf4+     (0:19)
 27.  Kh1      (0:02)    Raf8     (0:05)
 28.  Raf1     (0:03)    Rxg1+    (0:07)
 29.  Rxg1     (0:01)    Kd8      (0:07)
 30.  Nxc5     (0:05)    Qf5      (0:08)
 31.  Rd1+     (0:05)    Ke7      (0:03)
 32.  Qe3      (0:03)    Qf3+     (0:08)
 33.  Qxf3     (0:02)    Rxf3     (0:01)
 34.  Kg2      (0:01)    Rf4      (0:03)
 35.  Nxa6     (0:07)    Ra4      (0:02)
 36.  Nc5      (0:02)    Rxa2     (0:01)
 37.  Rb1      (0:04)    Kd6      (0:03)
 38.  Ne4+     (0:01)    Kd5      (0:01)
 39.  Nc3+     (0:01)
       {Black resigns} 1-0

What you maybe fail to appreciate is that this is a fast blitz game and the move
made 38...Kd5 in one sec could have been for an expected 38. White move other
than Ne4+. Either way to me seems pretty harsh to conclude anything from such an
example.

Sarah.





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.