Author: odell hall
Date: 21:37:41 07/01/01
I DON'T get it, why does it take me 5 min 48 sec to find 9...Qa5 in the below
game, i use a thunderbird 1000 with 128 megs of ram, running tiger 14, the
machine below is a Pent III 866 with 256 of ram, however it found the move in 4
min 40 sec if the log is correct. Is it possible the pent3 outperforms the
thunderbird 1000? I am running Tiger 14 in the Chessbase GUI, how long does it
take others to find 9...Qa5?? or perhaps it is an experimental version of tiger
which was used in the below game??
[Site "Florida"]
[Date "2001.06.28"]
[Round "7"]
[White "Rodriguez, Andres"]
[Black "COMP Chess Tiger"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B54"]
[WhiteElo "2500"]
[BlackElo "2632"]
[PlyCount "60"]
[EventDate "2001.06.22"]
[Source "RGA"]
1. e4 {0} 1... c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {43} 2... d6 {0} 3. d4 {14} 3... cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4
{11} 4... Nf6 {0} 5. f3 {47} 5... Nc6 {0} 6. Nc3 {43} 6... e5 {0} 7. Nb3 {24}
7... Be7 {0} 8. Be3 {52} 8... O-O {0} 9. Qd2 {162} 9... a5 {0} 10. Rd1 {80}
10... a4 {0.60/15 296} 11. Nc1 {48} 11... Qa5 {0.62/14 287} 12. a3 {190} 12...
Be6 {0.50/15 0} 13. Qf2 {680} 13... Bd8 {0.46/16 0} 14. Bd3 {284} 14... d5 {
-0.34/16 243} 15. Bd2 {17} 15... dxe4 {-0.36/15 147} 16. Nxe4 {361} 16... Nxe4
{-0.16/16 0} 17. Bxe4 {98} 17... Qb5 {-0.28/15 109} 18. Nd3 {491} 18... f5 {
-0.30/15 0} 19. Bxc6 {29} 19... bxc6 {-0.46/15 247} 20. Bb4 {5} 20... Bb6 {
-0.84/14 245} 21. Qg3 {994} 21... e4 {-1.20/16 0} 22. Bxf8 {146} 22... Rxf8 {
-1.62/14 22} 23. Qe5 {161} 23... Qc4 {-2.44/14 259} 24. Nf4 {170} 24... Bf7 {
-3.02/13 192} 25. Qc3 {379} 25... Qb5 {-3.86/14 0} 26. Rd4 {177} 26... c5 {
-5.44/15 216} 27. Rd2 {136} 27... Ba5 {-7.04/15 171} 28. Qe3 {18} 28... Re8 {
-7.28/15 160} 29. Ne2 {137} 29... f4 {-9.18/16 347} 30. Qxf4 {187} 30... e3 {
-9.08/15 0} 0-1
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.