Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 04:00:43 07/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 2001 at 03:24:14, Mark Young wrote: >I don't think anykind of chess program no matter how well it plays is a big >achievement in A.I. Chess is 100% tactical, and one big finite tree. What is >amazing is how well humans can play the game, not computers. Chess, Checkers, is >simple. Go is harder, but just a bigger Tree. > >For me the Real A. I. test for computers is not any of those games. > >Poker is a true test for computer A. I. in terms of games. IMO. I agree with you that Chess is very tactical game (let's say 95 %) , but if you say that it's not an achievement to have chess programs playing like GM for the artificial intelligence science you are simply saying that no intelligence is needed to play chess...and as you stated before is instead needed to play poker. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.