Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 05:17:28 07/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 2001 at 07:30:55, Mark Young wrote: > >That is exactly what I am saying...no intelligence is needed to play chess. It >can be solved by pure calculation. That however is not how humans approch the >game. Humans use their intelligence as a short cut...computers use mostly >calculation. I agree with you. BTW probably the most relevant factor in human gm is the "visual memory" to retain all the variation in the mind's eye : this is an explanation of how good they are in blindfold games. The human "intuition" in chess is probably a mechanism of pattern recognition based on previously "stored" positions increasing with expertise. >Since calculation can bring you the same degree of understanding computer can >perform as Grandmasters. However computers programs are using no real >intelligence. > >Poker posses a more difficult challenges to a computer’s A. I., as judgment and >understanding can not be mimicked by calculation alone. Since poker is not >always won by having a superior position, or in this case the strongest hand. I agree with you also on this point. Best Regards, Otello.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.