Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Re; Your choice

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 06:30:09 07/02/01

Go up one level in this thread


On July 02, 2001 at 09:08:18, Chessfun wrote:

>On July 01, 2001 at 18:01:23, K. Burcham wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>i watched this game.
>>
>>in a 3/3 game there was plenty of time to not play Kd5.
>
>Maybe plenty of time but the log indicates 1 second used.
>
>>this was not 1/0, or 3/0.
>
>No, it's 3/3 !! really, this is BLITZ.
>
>>this was a mental blunder where 98% of the GM brain was occupied in deep
>>analysis, and the other 2% made the move.
>
>No, this I'm interested to know more about. How did you get this data.?
>
>>i am not concluding a harsh thought about a GM that i admire, miss sarah.
>>i am just amazed at some of the GM play at the servers.
>
>You really think much to much.
>This is a blitz game. I can show you GM's missing a direct mate in blitz.
>It's not news. At 3 or 4 NPS the human brain makes slips.

I can add that it is possible that the GM simply was not concentrated at the
same second that he played the blunder.

There may be a lot of reasons(for example it is possible that he talked on the
telephone during playing or it is possible that his child was crying at the same
time).

These games are not for money so the GM's do not consider them as important.

I know about other stupid blunders at blitz when the games are for money.

In one case a GM had 7 seconds for all the game when his opponent had only one
second to finish the game.

The GM with the 7 seconds found a winning move but unfortunately it took him all
the 7 seconds so he lost on time.

He could do better by winning on time without finding the best move and he lost
money for not doing it.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.