Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 09:11:59 07/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 2001 at 09:00:48, Chessfun wrote:
>On July 02, 2001 at 00:37:41, odell hall wrote:
>
>>
>>I DON'T get it, why does it take me 5 min 48 sec to find 9...Qa5 in the below
>>game, i use a thunderbird 1000 with 128 megs of ram, running tiger 14, the
>>machine below is a Pent III 866 with 256 of ram, however it found the move in 4
>>min 40 sec if the log is correct. Is it possible the pent3 outperforms the
>>thunderbird 1000? I am running Tiger 14 in the Chessbase GUI, how long does it
>>take others to find 9...Qa5?? or perhaps it is an experimental version of tiger
>>which was used in the below game??
>>
>>[Site "Florida"]
>>[Date "2001.06.28"]
>>[Round "7"]
>>[White "Rodriguez, Andres"]
>>[Black "COMP Chess Tiger"]
>>[Result "0-1"]
>>[ECO "B54"]
>>[WhiteElo "2500"]
>>[BlackElo "2632"]
>>[PlyCount "60"]
>>[EventDate "2001.06.22"]
>>[Source "RGA"]
>>
>>1. e4 {0} 1... c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {43} 2... d6 {0} 3. d4 {14} 3... cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4
>>{11} 4... Nf6 {0} 5. f3 {47} 5... Nc6 {0} 6. Nc3 {43} 6... e5 {0} 7. Nb3 {24}
>>7... Be7 {0} 8. Be3 {52} 8... O-O {0} 9. Qd2 {162} 9... a5 {0} 10. Rd1 {80}
>>10... a4 {0.60/15 296} 11. Nc1 {48} 11... Qa5 {0.62/14 287}
>
>
>This is Tiger 14.0 in Chessbase interface on a Thunderbird at 945 mhz.
>This is with opponent is human ticked in engine parameters, I never tried in CP.
>
>I assume one reason it's slower than the PIII 866 is that on our machines,
>mine and yours we have other things running. Start taskinfo and you'll see
>what I mean. I assume on the 866 it's a barebones machine without much else
>running. Also you should take into account Tiger's ponder of move 11. Nc1
>which it ponders and therefore add 48 seconds to it's 287 giving 335 seconds.
>
>I have no doubt that even my TB900 is faster than a normal PIII 866, it could
>also be slightly overclocked for all we know.
>
>Chess Tiger 14.0
>r1bq1rk1/1p2bppp/2np1n2/4p3/p3P3/2N1BP2/PPPQ2PP/2NRKB1R b K - 0 1
>
>Analysis by Chess Tiger 14.0:
>
>11...a3 12.b3 d5 13.Nxd5 Nxd5 14.exd5 Nd4 15.Kf2 Nf5 16.c4 e4 17.fxe4 Bh4+
>18.Kg1 Nxe3 19.Qxe3 Be6
> ² (0.70) Depth: 14 00:00:53 10477kN
>11...Be6 12.Nd5 Bxd5 13.exd5 Nd4 14.Bxd4 exd4 15.Qxd4 Qa5+ 16.Rd2 Nd7 17.Qg4 Ne5
>18.Qf5 Qb6 19.Nd3 Bh4+ 20.g3
> ² (0.66) Depth: 14 00:02:48 35848kN
>11...Qa5 12.a3 Be6 13.Qf2
> ² (0.62) Depth: 14 00:05:39 75292kN
>
>So I have 339 secs.
>
>Sarah.
Hi!
I believe a P3 866 with 133 bus, 6,5 x 133 could be very close to an Athlon 945
(9x105) because of the faster bus, so everything seems ok.
Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.