Author: Ed Panek
Date: 19:47:30 07/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 2001 at 22:25:05, Terry McCracken wrote: >On July 02, 2001 at 21:20:05, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On July 02, 2001 at 20:05:41, Ed Panek wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>07:39:57.3 -0.55 22 -682883684 d5 f5 Ba7 Kf7 Ke2 Nb2 >>> >>> >>>25:16:42.2 -0.66 23 1576112625 d5 Nbd2+ Bxd2 Nxd2+ Ke2 Ne4 Kd3 f5 Nb4 Kf8 Kc4 >>>Ke7 Kb3 Nf2 Kxa3 Nh3 Kb3 Nxf4 Kc4 >>> >>>28:23:16.5 -0.64 23 -2083828238 Ke2 Kf8 d5 Ke7 Ba7 Nb2 Bb8 f6 d6+ Ke6 gxf6 Kxf6 >>>d7 Nd4+ Kd2 Ne6 Nb4 Ke7 Kc2 Kxd7 >>>50:48:57.8 -0.46 23 -1036036508 Bf2 >>>58:41:43.9 -0.46 23 -1713253994 Bf2 >>> >>> >>>I have intentionally deleted the PV from these last two moves for obvious >>>reasons >>> >>> >>>Cheers, >>> >>>Ed >> >>The main reason is that there are people competing for the Weekly Prize and the >>DGT Board Final Prize. And providing the PV will make it easy for those that >>have not won a prize yet, and unfair for those that don't have a chance to see >>this intense analysis. >> >>PS: The Rebel Forum is suppose to be a message board to comment the web's move >>after it has been submited _Not_ before, since a lot of people are complaining >>saying that those that simply read the Rebel Forum have the edge and are taking >>the fun out of the game for those that are trying to find the best move for >>themselves. Remember this is suppose to be an individual effort by each and >>everyone participating as the web against Gambit Tiger II. >> >> >> >>Pichard. > >I'd also like to know why the computer was _allowed_ 2days,10hrs.41min.44sec. to >work on the move!.....The web can't get that kind of time as a rule. As a matter >of fact in the last few votes the web's move was displayed with the computers' >answer! >Also McCarthy messed things up and no one tried to put a stop to it! >I've written all of you but none of you will return my messages! >The best move was in all probablity Nf5! with winning posibilities but with >the Rebel Bieng _sabotaged_ by McCarthy made it impossible to work that line >to the end, as it was very very deep. >So no one really new what to play....and Nc4!? was the _safe_ move with hopes >of provoking 44.d5, well it took 2days 2hrs.48min.59sec. before it found the >_correct_ 44.Bf2! the _only_ move to hold it's game, with some chances for the >web. Very Unclear....Probably Draw. >Also it appears from checking McCarthy's site he's planning to disrupt the game >again!A personal attack against me, and in the process damaging the game further >for all of us! What are you going to do about it, if he spams his lines and >tries to drag my name through the mud once again? > >Terry (Sick of the BS and Lies) Terry, I can understand your feelings of frustration that the computer was allowed to think for what you consider to be an unfair think time, however I consider Gt2's time to begin when the web page is updated. That was sometime during 7/2/01...today. The web routinely get 2-3 days for a reply. I suspect that when my reply is posted the web will have about 2 days to reply. As far as another person having an agenda against you, there is not a thing I can do about it....Im not sure anyone here really should/could do anything about it. It is his website and he can post most anything about you that is not libelous or slanderous. Best of Luck, Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.