Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 20:47:30 07/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 2001 at 22:47:30, Ed Panek wrote: >On July 02, 2001 at 22:25:05, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On July 02, 2001 at 21:20:05, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On July 02, 2001 at 20:05:41, Ed Panek wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>07:39:57.3 -0.55 22 -682883684 d5 f5 Ba7 Kf7 Ke2 Nb2 >>>> >>>> >>>>25:16:42.2 -0.66 23 1576112625 d5 Nbd2+ Bxd2 Nxd2+ Ke2 Ne4 Kd3 f5 Nb4 Kf8 Kc4 >>>>Ke7 Kb3 Nf2 Kxa3 Nh3 Kb3 Nxf4 Kc4 >>>> >>>>28:23:16.5 -0.64 23 -2083828238 Ke2 Kf8 d5 Ke7 Ba7 Nb2 Bb8 f6 d6+ Ke6 gxf6 Kxf6 >>>>d7 Nd4+ Kd2 Ne6 Nb4 Ke7 Kc2 Kxd7 >>>>50:48:57.8 -0.46 23 -1036036508 Bf2 >>>>58:41:43.9 -0.46 23 -1713253994 Bf2 >>>> >>>> >>>>I have intentionally deleted the PV from these last two moves for obvious >>>>reasons >>>> >>>> >>>>Cheers, >>>> >>>>Ed >>> >>>The main reason is that there are people competing for the Weekly Prize and the >>>DGT Board Final Prize. And providing the PV will make it easy for those that >>>have not won a prize yet, and unfair for those that don't have a chance to see >>>this intense analysis. >>> >>>PS: The Rebel Forum is suppose to be a message board to comment the web's move >>>after it has been submited _Not_ before, since a lot of people are complaining >>>saying that those that simply read the Rebel Forum have the edge and are taking >>>the fun out of the game for those that are trying to find the best move for >>>themselves. Remember this is suppose to be an individual effort by each and >>>everyone participating as the web against Gambit Tiger II. >>> >>> >>> >>>Pichard. >> >>I'd also like to know why the computer was _allowed_ 2days,10hrs.41min.44sec. to >>work on the move!.....The web can't get that kind of time as a rule. As a matter >>of fact in the last few votes the web's move was displayed with the computers' >>answer! >>Also McCarthy messed things up and no one tried to put a stop to it! >>I've written all of you but none of you will return my messages! >>The best move was in all probablity Nf5! with winning posibilities but with >>the Rebel Bieng _sabotaged_ by McCarthy made it impossible to work that line >>to the end, as it was very very deep. >>So no one really new what to play....and Nc4!? was the _safe_ move with hopes >>of provoking 44.d5, well it took 2days 2hrs.48min.59sec. before it found the >>_correct_ 44.Bf2! the _only_ move to hold it's game, with some chances for the >>web. Very Unclear....Probably Draw. >>Also it appears from checking McCarthy's site he's planning to disrupt the game >>again!A personal attack against me, and in the process damaging the game further >>for all of us! What are you going to do about it, if he spams his lines and >>tries to drag my name through the mud once again? >> >>Terry (Sick of the BS and Lies) > > > Terry, > I can understand your feelings of frustration that the computer was allowed >to think for what you consider to be an unfair think time, however I consider >Gt2's time to begin when the web page is updated. That was sometime during >7/2/01...today. The web routinely get 2-3 days for a reply. I suspect that when >my reply is posted the web will have about 2 days to reply. > > As far as another person having an agenda against you, there is not a thing I >can do about it....Im not sure anyone here really should/could do anything about >it. It is his website and he can post most anything about you that is not >libelous or slanderous. > >Best of Luck, > >Ed Thanks Ed for repling to me here, at least you can understand my frustration. And thank you for wishing me luck! But I'd like to mention that the Rebel Forum is Rebel's site! Yes, it's true we often get two days, but I chose Nc4 as I was too distracted by McCarthy's (libelous) attacks on the Rebel Forum and out right ridicule that no one should have to tolorate! In effect weaking the game. Too bad, really. I don't like posting this info, but I think people must know about McCarthy, as he's poisened many internet games and attacked many good people when he is confronted. I remeber all the crap from the World vs Kasparov, and McCarthy played a big role in contaiminating that game. I can't prove it but I believe he used alter egos there to really slam people, although he did a good job under his own name. He _may_ have been or _may_ have been in cohoots with Spirev(sp)? and maybe....yes maybe, I don't know for sure, but will try to find out, he _may_ have been Jose Unodos! He interestinly refered at his site I might be Spirev! That is strange!! This is something I found still at the MSN site by McCarthy. Funny how he took interest in this character? Subject: From: Host: Date: Re: Kasparov is win at all costs slime BMcC We gave KLaspy chance to be fair 130.219.92.174 Fri Oct 15 18:06:39 So what if he takes a couple of moves per turn on a girl he insulted, so what if it taked 2 idiotic Grandmaster and a whole crew of apathetic MSN bootlickers to stop the 2850 Krush machine, hey a win is a win. Who cares if people wanted to look at the game as the rules dictated, with 24 hrs for us to move and analysts help? a point is a point. On Fri Oct 15 18:01:47, when he sees Qe1 wrote: > .... then he will play Qxe1+ > > > Boy, Jose Unodos sure changed things in about a week's > time. Hey, he did warn you all. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- And this I recieved from a player from McCarthy's WT Page. I am on the Executive Council of the WT and my comment when we banned Brian from the Yin Hao site was that we really didn't have to wait until his head revolved 360 degrees and he spewed green slime to ban him. His personal attacks on Irina Krush, Paul Hodges, and others were intolerable. He nearly drove all our International Masters off the game. Lasker/Nimzovitch, Zurich, 1934 is a wonderful game and the prototype for all these passed center pawn versus passed rook pawn knight endings. Sorry to intrude on the GT2 game so late. You did a super job of turning the game around. Chess players like sharks smell blood and we cluster for the kill. Best wishes, kb2ct McCarthy is someone _not_ to be crossed, even in defence....so watch him closely! He's Bad News, Period! Terry McCracken
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.