Author: Mark Young
Date: 02:47:22 07/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2001 at 04:37:17, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 03, 2001 at 03:33:58, Adolfo Bormida wrote: > >> >>According the games played, I have *only* the suspect that CT 14 maybe is more >>strong against humans than against computer. Gambit Tiger 2 is ahead in the >>Sweden List, but against hummans is better than Tiger?? >>It is possible?? >> >>We can remember that Rebel Century is sure better against humans. > >I do not know it. >We know nothing about the question which program is best against humans at >tournament time control thanks to Fide that does not let computers to be rated. > >I suspect that Fide may be one of the reasons of the good result of programs >against humans(Humans are more motivated to win other humans and not to win >computers because they know their games against computers are not included for >the rating list) > >This problem can be solved only if the humans get money for winning or drawing >against computers that is eqvivalent to the rating change that they could get >from not losing aginst the computer in fair conditions. You can argue about the rating change, but they are playing this tournament for money. A win, loss, or draw counts in the standings in the tournament and prize money. Unless my information I have is incorrect. > >Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.