Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 05:55:14 07/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2001 at 03:24:25, Adolfo Bormida wrote: >On July 03, 2001 at 02:10:32, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On July 03, 2001 at 01:08:54, Tony Asdourian wrote: >> >>>CT just beat a second GM, this one rated 2550 or so. Apparently made a really >>>nice sac in the process. I've always been quite impressed with Fritz6, but >>>looking at what CT 14.0 and GT2 are doing reminds me of the old Novag and RISC >>>2500 dedicated computers, which for their time played with attacking flair but >>>were also more than just tactical monsters, they seemed to "enjoy" playing >>>aggresively. It is fun to watch this new program play so well. The online >>>interview with Christopher Theron he gave recently is also the most revealing >>>I've read from a top programmer in quite a while. >> >>It's game against Rodriguez was good, but this one was really pathetic. What the >>heck was Ricardi thinking when he played the opening? He fell for a fairly basic >>tactic on move 7 leaving him much worse and by move 13 he's down a pawn. After >>that it was just a matter of time. Really not a lot to say about it other than >>it was a point for Tiger. >> >> Albert > >Hi Albert >I'm not agree! Ricardi was played the oppenning not well. Then in move 13th. He >sac a pawn for some compensation according Ricardi's comments after the game 1) >Can castling 2)Use the Open c file. If you can see the evaluation 12..., Ne7 is >the second choice at ply 14 according ChessTiger. I think when you say "this one >was really pathetic" you are using a very strong word and you no have respect >for a 2550 GM! (who beat Karpov last year). Can you be sure than you can beat >the "patetic Ricardi" after move 13? > >No offense, not missunderstand me. English is not my native language and only >give my view. > >Regards, Adolfo Ricardi isn't a very good computer opponent. Against Crafty on ICC, he has won 23, lost 129, drawn 16. Against scrappy he has lost 2 but that is all he has played. Other GMs do much better than that. Yes he is a good player. But he plays normal chess and doesn't seem to want to understand the "opponent" (the computer)...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.