Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:08:15 07/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2001 at 08:55:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On July 03, 2001 at 03:24:25, Adolfo Bormida wrote: > >>On July 03, 2001 at 02:10:32, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>On July 03, 2001 at 01:08:54, Tony Asdourian wrote: >>> >>>>CT just beat a second GM, this one rated 2550 or so. Apparently made a really >>>>nice sac in the process. I've always been quite impressed with Fritz6, but >>>>looking at what CT 14.0 and GT2 are doing reminds me of the old Novag and RISC >>>>2500 dedicated computers, which for their time played with attacking flair but >>>>were also more than just tactical monsters, they seemed to "enjoy" playing >>>>aggresively. It is fun to watch this new program play so well. The online >>>>interview with Christopher Theron he gave recently is also the most revealing >>>>I've read from a top programmer in quite a while. >>> >>>It's game against Rodriguez was good, but this one was really pathetic. What the >>>heck was Ricardi thinking when he played the opening? He fell for a fairly basic >>>tactic on move 7 leaving him much worse and by move 13 he's down a pawn. After >>>that it was just a matter of time. Really not a lot to say about it other than >>>it was a point for Tiger. >>> >>> Albert >> >>Hi Albert >>I'm not agree! Ricardi was played the oppenning not well. Then in move 13th. He >>sac a pawn for some compensation according Ricardi's comments after the game 1) >>Can castling 2)Use the Open c file. If you can see the evaluation 12..., Ne7 is >>the second choice at ply 14 according ChessTiger. I think when you say "this one >>was really pathetic" you are using a very strong word and you no have respect >>for a 2550 GM! (who beat Karpov last year). Can you be sure than you can beat >>the "patetic Ricardi" after move 13? >> >>No offense, not missunderstand me. English is not my native language and only >>give my view. >> >>Regards, Adolfo > >Ricardi isn't a very good computer opponent. Against Crafty on ICC, he has >won 23, lost 129, drawn 16. It means almost 20% What is the time control of these games? Against scrappy he has lost 2 but that is all he >has played. Other GMs do much better than that. What is the score of Crafty and Scrappy against GM's at standard time control at the same time that Ricardi got the +23 -129 =16? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.