Author: martin fierz
Date: 06:21:21 07/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2001 at 08:51:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On July 03, 2001 at 03:29:44, Tanya Deborah wrote: > >>On July 03, 2001 at 03:01:54, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On July 03, 2001 at 02:54:14, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >>> >>>>Hi Mark, >>>>I have only a comment about it : >>>>Amazing! >>>> >>>>Regards. >>> >>>No not for some of us here? Chris, others, and me...the silent is deafening. >> >> >>Incredible result for Chess Tiger beating 2 GM´s in a row!! >> >>Come on guys! The performance of Chess Tiger in this tournament is not a IM >>strenght, is clearly a GM performance!!! >> >>Congratulations for Chris! >> >> >>Best Regards >>Tanya.D > > >Sure it is. And it will continue to be so until the humans stop with the >dumb (against computer) openings. I've said that many times before. If the >humans play "normal chess" against the computer, they are going to have _great_ >difficulty. If they play the opponent rather than playing the board, things >won't look so great. But until they start... ricardi tried to get a closed position against the tiger, see http://www.chessbase.com/news/games/argen.htm to me, this looks like the humans are doing everything wrong. they are afraid to play normal chess, so they play strange openings like ricardi here only to get a terrible position already after 10 moves. it reminds me a bit of the kasparov-deep blue match... i think if humans seriously prepared against computers, they could do much better, but at the moment there is just no incentive. like $$, but we will see what kramnik does when there is something at stake. just for the record, this is NOT to degrade the tiger's performance in any way, it is doing very well! cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.