Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:24:55 07/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2001 at 09:08:15, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 03, 2001 at 08:55:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On July 03, 2001 at 03:24:25, Adolfo Bormida wrote: >> >>>On July 03, 2001 at 02:10:32, Albert Silver wrote: >>> >>>>On July 03, 2001 at 01:08:54, Tony Asdourian wrote: >>>> >>>>>CT just beat a second GM, this one rated 2550 or so. Apparently made a really >>>>>nice sac in the process. I've always been quite impressed with Fritz6, but >>>>>looking at what CT 14.0 and GT2 are doing reminds me of the old Novag and RISC >>>>>2500 dedicated computers, which for their time played with attacking flair but >>>>>were also more than just tactical monsters, they seemed to "enjoy" playing >>>>>aggresively. It is fun to watch this new program play so well. The online >>>>>interview with Christopher Theron he gave recently is also the most revealing >>>>>I've read from a top programmer in quite a while. >>>> >>>>It's game against Rodriguez was good, but this one was really pathetic. What the >>>>heck was Ricardi thinking when he played the opening? He fell for a fairly basic >>>>tactic on move 7 leaving him much worse and by move 13 he's down a pawn. After >>>>that it was just a matter of time. Really not a lot to say about it other than >>>>it was a point for Tiger. >>>> >>>> Albert >>> >>>Hi Albert >>>I'm not agree! Ricardi was played the oppenning not well. Then in move 13th. He >>>sac a pawn for some compensation according Ricardi's comments after the game 1) >>>Can castling 2)Use the Open c file. If you can see the evaluation 12..., Ne7 is >>>the second choice at ply 14 according ChessTiger. I think when you say "this one >>>was really pathetic" you are using a very strong word and you no have respect >>>for a 2550 GM! (who beat Karpov last year). Can you be sure than you can beat >>>the "patetic Ricardi" after move 13? >>> >>>No offense, not missunderstand me. English is not my native language and only >>>give my view. >>> >>>Regards, Adolfo >> >>Ricardi isn't a very good computer opponent. Against Crafty on ICC, he has >>won 23, lost 129, drawn 16. > >It means almost 20% > >What is the time control of these games? > > Against scrappy he has lost 2 but that is all he >>has played. Other GMs do much better than that. > >What is the score of Crafty and Scrappy against GM's at standard time control at >the same time that Ricardi got the +23 -129 =16? > >Uri Crafty has done well at longer time controls. But again, because most GM players prefer to play "real chess" rather than "anti-computer chess" against it. I am sure Ricardi could do better, _if_ he was willing to change his style to avoid the strengths of the computer. See my response to Dan to see what I mean...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.