Author: Tanya Deborah
Date: 22:17:34 07/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2001 at 08:51:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On July 03, 2001 at 03:29:44, Tanya Deborah wrote: > >>On July 03, 2001 at 03:01:54, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On July 03, 2001 at 02:54:14, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >>> >>>>Hi Mark, >>>>I have only a comment about it : >>>>Amazing! >>>> >>>>Regards. >>> >>>No not for some of us here? Chris, others, and me...the silent is deafening. >> >> >>Incredible result for Chess Tiger beating 2 GM´s in a row!! >> >>Come on guys! The performance of Chess Tiger in this tournament is not a IM >>strenght, is clearly a GM performance!!! >> >>Congratulations for Chris! >> >> >>Best Regards >>Tanya.D > > >Sure it is. And it will continue to be so until the humans stop with the >dumb (against computer) openings. I've said that many times before. If the >humans play "normal chess" against the computer, they are going to have _great_ >difficulty. If they play the opponent rather than playing the board, things >won't look so great. But until they start... Hi Bob! Then if the Humans play ¨dumb¨ openings against Computers, Do the computers play at GM level ???? Anyway, I find this games very attractive, and this is the way that i like and i want to see a GM play against a computer program... This anticomputer openings are so booriing!! :-) As you know a great master in beating computer programs is JRLOK !(ICC) I saw this player beating many computer programs without any anticomputer opening. This is that i want to see by the others GM players!.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.