Author: martin fierz
Date: 05:18:11 07/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2001 at 08:15:22, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On July 04, 2001 at 07:41:18, martin fierz wrote: > >>>Both of these are not very effective against top programs of the new generation, >>>because a lot of weaknesses in that sense have been fixed. >>>In any case ,especially the second type of technique, is IMO a kind of tentative >>>to "cheat" the computer. >>> > >Ok, Martin. >I have put the verb "cheat" between quotes ,referring it to the computer >programs, as a try to fool its algorithms. >The wits you are mentioning in the case of the machines doesn't simply apply >because the computers are brainless robots :) right, i understand what you mean - it is a game of wits between the chess players and the chess programmers of course, with the players trying to get closed positions, and the programmers trying to get open positions for their program - with opening book lines and specific code in their program. a try to fool it's algorithm is exactly what it is, that's a much better way to say it! cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.