Author: martin fierz
Date: 05:25:48 07/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2001 at 08:16:24, Tony Asdourian wrote: >An IM lost in tweny-something moves. Looks like he tried to mix it up tactically >and got killed. Or was it a blunder? From most of the posts here, I sort of >get the impression that even trying to engage a top program in tactics, unless >you are Anand, is a blunder. Or is that too strong? I get the impression from >Robert Hyatt that the strength of these programs drops 300 points if you play >anti-computer strategies, but that otherwise they will kill even very strong >players. replaying the game on http://www.chessbase.com/news/games/argen.htm it seems that white was much better in this game - at least they give a variation on move 16 in which white wins a pawn. also, on move 19 the chessbase page gives a drawish ending. looks like white blundered it... cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.