Author: Mark Young
Date: 07:18:12 07/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2001 at 10:12:12, Adam Oellermann wrote: >>Sorry, but he is a clown, 1. For assuming I only looked at the move number >>before making a comment about the game. 2. For saying white was winning the game >>when he blundered. >> >>I don't give a damn what his rating is, He was wrong on both counts. > >OK, lets assume for the moment you're right on both counts (with a feeble 1500 >rating I ain't gonna argue with no-one :) ) I still believe the correct response >is to set out your reasoning and arguments in a response. Resorting to >name-calling, especially when your opponent in a debate is behaving reasonably, >seems unreasonable. This sort of attitude definitely undermines your viewpoint - >however valid your arguments may be. Ok..I can live with that, If saying someone is being a clown undermines me, so be it. > >Regards >Adam
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.