Author: martin fierz
Date: 07:43:43 07/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2001 at 10:33:41, Albert Silver wrote: >On July 04, 2001 at 09:31:29, martin fierz wrote: > >>On July 04, 2001 at 09:03:48, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >> >>>On July 04, 2001 at 08:35:02, martin fierz wrote: >>> >>>>hi mark! >>>> >>>>why don't you look at the game instead of at the number of moves? this is no >>>>crush. white was much better and blundered. >>> >>>Probably he was intimidated by his strong opponent... >>> >>>>look at the variations on the >>>>chessbase web page. >>>> >>> >>>I looked at the variations and I've seen a wonderful queen sacrifice by Tiger. >> >>yes, tiger wins with some tactics. around move 15 white is just better - good >>pressure against b7 and afterwards c6. i'm not saying white is winning - far >>from it, but he has a pleasant position. and he blunders when it gets sharp. >>some people think that "crush = win in less than N moves". to crush someone in >>chess is to outplay him. that's not what the tiger did. >>i'm not saying it's weak or not GM level or anything - only there are some >>enthusiasts here who probably have about 1200 rating and cannot see what is >>happening... >> >>cheers >> martin > >Sorry to disagree with you but you are clearly blinded by your anti-computer >prejudice and refusal to see the facts. White was slightly better up until maybe >4 moves before the end, then walked into some B class tactics exploiting the 8th >rank and then a horribly complicated 2 move pin. All of which is quite typical >of crushing Grandmaster play. Wake up and smell the coffee buddy. > > Albert oh, right, i missed that; it's a crush after all! cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.