Author: martin fierz
Date: 07:46:26 07/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2001 at 09:49:04, Mark Young wrote: >On July 04, 2001 at 09:37:29, Adam Oellermann wrote: > >>Hi there >> >>>Hey clown, why don't you look at the game for yourself...Black was better in >>>this game when white blundered. It is not like Tiger was losing, and a 25 move >>>win is a crush....Tiger refuted whites play Qxa7 ....Crush!!! >> >>I'm sure you can make your point without the insulting name-calling - it just >>costs you respect. Martin Fierz appears to have a FIDE elo (see his profile) >>which implies that his assessment of the situation on the board may have >>something to it. I'm not saying that he's right or wrong; just that it's worth >>looking into without getting insulting. > >Sorry, but he is a clown, 1. For assuming I only looked at the move number >before making a comment about the game. 2. For saying white was winning the game >when he blundered. > >I don't give a damn what his rating is, He was wrong on both counts. i said 'white is much better'. maybe that is wrong, and he is only slightly better. i didn't say white was winning. sorry for assuming you only looked at the move number. cheers martin-the-clown
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.