Author: Mark Young
Date: 08:08:05 07/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2001 at 10:46:26, martin fierz wrote: >On July 04, 2001 at 09:49:04, Mark Young wrote: > >>On July 04, 2001 at 09:37:29, Adam Oellermann wrote: >> >>>Hi there >>> >>>>Hey clown, why don't you look at the game for yourself...Black was better in >>>>this game when white blundered. It is not like Tiger was losing, and a 25 move >>>>win is a crush....Tiger refuted whites play Qxa7 ....Crush!!! >>> >>>I'm sure you can make your point without the insulting name-calling - it just >>>costs you respect. Martin Fierz appears to have a FIDE elo (see his profile) >>>which implies that his assessment of the situation on the board may have >>>something to it. I'm not saying that he's right or wrong; just that it's worth >>>looking into without getting insulting. >> >>Sorry, but he is a clown, 1. For assuming I only looked at the move number >>before making a comment about the game. 2. For saying white was winning the game >>when he blundered. >> >>I don't give a damn what his rating is, He was wrong on both counts. > >i said 'white is much better'. maybe that is wrong, and he is only slightly >better. i didn't say white was winning. sorry for assuming you only looked at >the move number. Sorry..also... I took much better as winning or near winning for white. I don't think this is the case, I think Black is *winning* this position before Qxa7. I can not find a good move for white in this position...and Rd1 seems to be a loser. > >cheers > martin-the-clown
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.