Author: Mark Young
Date: 10:01:12 07/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2001 at 12:00:26, martin fierz wrote: >On July 04, 2001 at 11:08:05, Mark Young wrote: > >>On July 04, 2001 at 10:46:26, martin fierz wrote: >> >>>On July 04, 2001 at 09:49:04, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>On July 04, 2001 at 09:37:29, Adam Oellermann wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi there >>>>> >>>>>>Hey clown, why don't you look at the game for yourself...Black was better in >>>>>>this game when white blundered. It is not like Tiger was losing, and a 25 move >>>>>>win is a crush....Tiger refuted whites play Qxa7 ....Crush!!! >>>>> >>>>>I'm sure you can make your point without the insulting name-calling - it just >>>>>costs you respect. Martin Fierz appears to have a FIDE elo (see his profile) >>>>>which implies that his assessment of the situation on the board may have >>>>>something to it. I'm not saying that he's right or wrong; just that it's worth >>>>>looking into without getting insulting. >>>> >>>>Sorry, but he is a clown, 1. For assuming I only looked at the move number >>>>before making a comment about the game. 2. For saying white was winning the game >>>>when he blundered. >>>> >>>>I don't give a damn what his rating is, He was wrong on both counts. >>> >>>i said 'white is much better'. maybe that is wrong, and he is only slightly >>>better. i didn't say white was winning. sorry for assuming you only looked at >>>the move number. >> >>Sorry..also... >> >>I took much better as winning or near winning for white. I don't think this is >>the case, I think Black is *winning* this position before Qxa7. > >i should have been more clear. "much better" is a bit too much, to me the >position just looks like one where black is under pressure and has no >perspectives - except if black is the chess tiger :-) > >>I can not find a good move for white in this position...and Rd1 seems to be a >>loser. > >23. Rc1 is surely a mistake, because it wastes time - he must have overlooked >Qxc5!. so after Qxc5 he definitely is on the receiving end. of course after Qxa7 >he is looking in bad shape. i think a good improvement for white would be 19. >Bb2. the chessbase webpage gives the line 19. ...Bxb2?! 20 Rxb2 Rab8 21. Rfb1 >Rxb2 22. Rxb2 Rd8 etc which is again just a nice position for white because of >the weak pawn on c6. i don't know who is producing these lines, as black i would >probably go for 19...e5, which avoids ending up with a bad bishop, but limits >the scope of the Bg7. again, i think white has a nice position. very far away >from winning, but just the kind of position where you can play on and on and on >and on... > >cheers > martin I do like your idea of 19. Bb2. The position is hard to judge from a dynamic point of view. From a static view white after 19.Bb2 looks to have an edge, but how much if any does he really have. I see many replies for black here, not sure, which is best at this time. 19. e5, 19. BxB, 19. Rab8, even 19. Reb8 looks a bit interesting.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.