Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:02:20 07/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2001 at 15:15:36, Ian Aston wrote: >On July 04, 2001 at 11:58:24, John Smith wrote: > >>On July 03, 2001 at 23:23:05, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On July 03, 2001 at 17:03:20, John Smith wrote: >>> >>>>On July 03, 2001 at 15:36:08, ERIQ wrote: >>>> >>>>>now I know their cheating >>>> >>>>Yes, indeed. >>> >>>Troll 2. >> >>Are you such a control freak that you need medication or medical help? I am now >>convinced that you are on Chessbase's payroll. Anytime anyone makes a >>disparaging comment against Chessbase, you immediately complain to the >>moderators to censor the post and proclaim to the masses that the post is >>nothing more than a troll. >> >>For what its worth to you, I consider you and your attitude to be obnoxious. I >>own 6 programs and have been playing my programs since 1997, so I am in my >>humble opinion just as much an expert as you. In my opinion, DF beating CT14 is >>just not credible. > >DF didn't beat CT14, the score was 20-20. Perfectly credible for programs that >are about the same strength. > > For you to brush off my views as troll, is more telling >>about your lack of breeding, tact, > >And what does inferring that people are cheating, without a single iota of >evidence, say about your breeding (whatever that means) and tact. > > and the fact that you may indeed be the >>recipient of some quid pro quo. > >That's the second, completely unsubstantiated and ludicrous, slur you have made. > >BTW, anyone with half a brain could see that if the SSDF really wanted to cheat >they could be a lot more subtle about it. > >Ian Aston John's malfunction is he thinks he is Larry or is it Chris... who knows he isn't sure. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.