Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Trollers like you version 2 corrections to Sarah's english

Author: John Smith

Date: 18:49:53 07/04/01

Go up one level in this thread


On July 04, 2001 at 16:48:44, Chessfun wrote:

>On July 04, 2001 at 11:58:24, John Smith wrote:
>
>>On July 03, 2001 at 23:23:05, Chessfun wrote:
>>
>>>On July 03, 2001 at 17:03:20, John Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>>On July 03, 2001 at 15:36:08, ERIQ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>now I know their cheating
>>>>
>>>>Yes, indeed.
>>>
>>>Troll 2.
>>
>>Are you such a control freak that you need medication or medical help?  I am now
>>convinced that you are on Chessbase's payroll.  Anytime anyone makes a
>>disparaging comment against Chessbase, you immediately complain to the
>>moderators to censor the post and proclaim to the masses that the post is
>>nothing more than a troll.
>
>Just one more troll...huh or?.
>
>Sorry, yet again you make false statements.
>I made no complaint to any moderators.
>
>So, I'm paid by Chessbase. Have you seen my rating list?
>http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999/rating.html
>
>What would you call your post?...Yes, indeed. A troll seems apt.
>
>
>>For what its worth to you, I consider you and your attitude to be obnoxious. I
>
>
>It's worth absolutely nothing to me. About the same as what your worth.


It should be "you're", not "your", unless you are referring to my total worth as
a human being, which should be significantly more than what you're worth.

>
>
>>own 6 programs and have been playing my programs since 1997, so I am in my
>>humble opinion just as much an expert as you.
>
>
>Indeed you certainly are an expert....shame your opinion isn't so humble as you
>claim.
>
>
> In my opinion, DF beating CT14 is
>>just not credible.  For you to brush off my views as troll, is more telling
>>about your lack of breeding, tact, and the fact that you may indeed be the
>>recipient of some quid pro quo.
>
>haha your views LOL your sick.

Again, it should be "you're", not "your".  Sarah, YOUR rapier wit, combined with
an astounding intellect (snickers), leaves me breathless.   Sarah, YOU'RE indeed
a gem among buffalo chips.

Notice how I correctly used YOUR and YOU'RE in a sentence.  With some work, and
sacrifice, you too can overcome YOUR problems.

:)





>Lets retrace your views.
>>>>>now I know their cheating
>
>Wow what a viewpoint, how did you come up with this startling discovery.
>Must have been years of scienticifc research...or?.
>
>Sarah.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.