Author: Chessfun
Date: 21:01:27 07/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2001 at 18:38:59, ERIQ wrote: >On July 04, 2001 at 17:56:53, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On July 04, 2001 at 17:35:42, ERIQ wrote: >> >>>evidence what more do you want fritz junior match this match the fact that fritz >>>got some special treatment ie. autoplayer if this isn't enough what is ?? >> >>I never heard it from Amir Ban. >>If he does not complain about it and does not say he thinks something is wrong I >>do not see a reason for you to think something is wrong. >ok >> >>> >>>also this is a message board so peoples thoughts popular or not are suppose to >>>be here. wake up their is something wrong and you know it to >> >>I do not know that something is wrong and I think that more than 95% of the >>readers do not assume that something wrong with the results. >> >>In most of the cases when you see 4-0 result between equal players nothing is >>wrong. >yes I am leaning this now but have never seen it before. Then don't you think you should be more careful with your choice of words next time rather than posting something like "now I know their cheating"...I could go on about the use of the word their, in that sentence however I'll leave that to Chris. Sarah. >> >>4-0 result between equal players is a reason to suspect with bigger probability >>that something may be wrong but it only means something like suspecting with >>probability of 10% instead of 1%(I did not calculate these probabilities and I >>only try to explain the idea by using them). >> >> >>Something is wrong is also not the same as cheating and I believe that in most >>of the cases the testers do not know that something is wrong when something is >>wrong. >perhaps, good points all just surprising to me thats all >> >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.