Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: muliti probcut

Author: martin fierz

Date: 01:58:45 07/05/01

Go up one level in this thread

On July 05, 2001 at 03:36:39, Tony Werten wrote:

>On July 04, 2001 at 07:01:55, martin fierz wrote:
>
>>On July 04, 2001 at 05:41:22, Dan Andersson wrote:
>>
>>>ProbCut and MultiProbCut:
>>>http://www.neci.nec.com/homepages/mic/publications.html
>>>AFAIK this is the canonical source.
>>
>>thanks! i had missed the multiprobcut paper there.
>>
>>has anyone ever tried this in chess?
>
>My guess, based on some talking with Ed en Richard, is that Rebel and Genius are
>using it. ( As a replacement for nullmove, or rather nullmove has replaced
>probcut )
>
>cheers,
>
>Tony

you mean nullmove is better than probcut for chess? or is it 'unclear'? in
checkers, probcut works fine.

cheers
  martin

• Re: muliti probcut Vincent Diepeveen 04:54:24 07/05/01
  • Re: muliti probcut Gunnar Andersson 10:22:18 07/05/01
    • Re: muliti probcut Vincent Diepeveen 13:23:15 07/05/01
      • Re: muliti probcut martin fierz 01:35:08 07/06/01
• Re: muliti probcut Tony Werten 02:10:12 07/05/01
  • Re: muliti probcut Vincent Diepeveen 04:59:00 07/05/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.