Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 14:55:55 07/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 05, 2001 at 17:38:03, Marc van Hal wrote: >On July 05, 2001 at 17:33:23, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On July 05, 2001 at 15:00:24, Marc van Hal wrote: >> >>>I started to play some games against Chessmaster and I was not glad how Junior >>>played >>>Then I played my self against Junior and I won 3 games in a row! >>> >>>Marc van Hal >> >>Some possible replies: >> >>1)No it is not a bug and only a design decision in order to make you happy. >>If you lose against Junior you are going to suffer and Amir does not want you to >>suffer. >> >>2)There is no doubt that there is a serious bug in Junior7. >>This bug is the reason that it beated Deep Fritz only 41-38 and not 79-0 > >I gues all of these anwers are nonsens right? >> >>3)Yes, there are many bugs in Junior7. >>One of these bugs is the reason that you could not post the games that you >>beated Junior7 because Junior7 did not save them. >> >>Junior7 also has a bad influence on your memory so you can not remember the >>games that Junior7 did not save. >> >>Uri) Hi, I played now the first games with Junior 7 and published the games on the new page ... Amateurs vs. Professionals ... This event is only in German available under: http://amateurschach.in-trier.de/schach/cbase/experiment.htm I saw in the first 2 tourneys that the endgame from Junior 7 is not very strong (compare to the other strong amateurs and professionals). But I have played not enough games for the moment. The new page have a replay zone. You can see here the evaluations in the games. But of course, I played only at the moment with the time control 40 moves in 10 minutes. With 40 moves in 40 minutes have Junior 6 very strong results in my CCE tourney. Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.