Author: Johan Melin
Date: 04:31:34 07/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 05, 2001 at 15:21:22, Randall Shane wrote: >Just a little post to work off frustration with my program, FreeChecking. > >I know it's not very good (around 1700-1800 ICC blitz when not broken), and it >makes up for lack of quality by being slow, and I've been rewriting parts of it >to simplify the spaghetti mess it had become over a couple of years of very >intermittent coding, but still... > >You know something's wrong somewhere when from the starting position, no book, >your search gives something like this (fixed 9-ply search) : > >FreeChecking mode=test ply=9 >Vars : cp(W) ply(9) pos((null)) trace(trace.txt) hash(23) phash(21) spec(TEST) > 1 0.00 plst [-0.25,0.25] [] > 1 0.00[ 21] plen 0.12 Pe2-e4 | Pe2-e4 > 2 0.00 plst [-0.13,0.37] [Pe2-e4] > 2 0.00[ 101] plen 0.00 Pe2-e4 | Pe2-e4 Pe7-e5 > 3 0.00 plst [-0.25,0.25] [Pe2-e4] > 3 0.00[ 721] plen 0.23 Pe2-e4 | Pe2-e4 Pe7-e5 Pd2-d3 > 4 0.01 plst [-0.02,0.48] [Pe2-e4] > 4 0.02[ 3399] plen -0.02 Ng1-f3 | Ng1-f3 Pf7-f5 Pd2-d4 Pe7-e5 > 5 0.02 plst [-0.27,0.23] [Ng1-f3] > 5 0.04[ 5146] plen 0.23 Ng1-f3 | Ng1-f3 Pd7-d5 Nf3-d4 Bc8-d7 Nb1-c3 > 6 0.04 plst [-0.02,0.48] [Ng1-f3] > 6 0.32[ 53609] plen -0.02 Ng1-f3 | Ng1-f3 Nb8-c6 Pe2-e4 Ng8-f6 Bf1-d3 >Pd7-d5 > 7 0.32 plst [-0.27,0.23] [Ng1-f3] > 7 0.61[ 100688] plen 0.23 Ng1-f3 | Ng1-f3 Pd7-d5 Nf3-d4 Pe7-e5 Nd4-b5 >Pg7-g5 Nb1-c3 > 8 0.61 plst [-0.02,0.48] [Ng1-f3] > 8 6.30[1123379] plen -0.02 Ng1-f3 | Ng1-f3 Pe7-e5 Pe2-e3 Nb8-c6 Pb2-b3 >Pd7-d5 Rh1-g1 Ng8-f6 > 9 6.30 plst [-0.27,0.23] [Ng1-f3] > 9 12.06[2139749] plen 0.23 Ng1-f3 | Ng1-f3 Pe7-e5 Nf3xe5 Pf7-f5 Pe2-e4 >Pd7-d6 Ne5-f3 Pf5xe4 Nb1-c3 > 9 12.06[2139749] move 0.23 Ng1-f3 | Ng1-f3 Pe7-e5 Nf3xe5 Pf7-f5 Pe2-e4 >Pd7-d6 Ne5-f3 Pf5xe4 Nb1-c3 > [nps=177469] [reg=697723,qs=1442026,eval=1442026,ill=43503] > [pos hits=370312, cutoffs=741, misses=1452974] > [pawn hits=1255167, misses=186859] >Move is Ng1-f3[0.23] > Ng1-f3 Pe7-e5 Nf3xe5 Pf7-f5 Pe2-e4 Pd7-d6 Ne5-f3 Pf5xe4 Nb1-c3 > > >I can't believe the final PV that my program is generating. I would suspect the >new search, except the old search didn't do any better. Probably something with >hashing, evaluation, or something else. :-) If I understand the output correctly, all the deeper results are unresolved failhighs or faillows? Then you need the research the same depth with a new window. /Johan Melin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.