Author: Christopher R. Dorr
Date: 12:07:05 07/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
A Quack? Hrm. let's see who the quack is here: 1. Number of people helped to create chess programs: Bob: Hundreds (including myself) Odell: none (as far as I can see) 2. Number of world class chess programs written: Bob: Several (Crafty, Cray Blitz, probably others) Odell: None again 3. Number of technical questions answered regarding computer chess: Bob: Thousands (RGCC, RGC, on ICC, and here) Odell: Given the beneit fo doubt, a couple 4. Number of programs released *entirely* to the public Bob: One world class program (Crafty) Odell: Absolutely none again 5. Number of people who recognize as a clear and respected expert in computer chess: Bob: Just about everybody Odell: None 6. Number of PhDs in Computer Science held: Bob: 1 Odell: None again Perhaps you can tell me again how Bob looks like a quack, and you don't? Chris On July 06, 2001 at 01:15:44, odell hall wrote: >Hey Chris I hope you see this post, > > In the face of conjectures you are the only one here who has used Facts to >support your point of view, even as you left tiger performed at the 2700 elo >level, silencing all your critics. Dr. Hyatt is looking more and more like a >Quack.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.