Author: Joshua Lee
Date: 16:58:54 07/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
Show me all kinds of numbers but if Computers are GM strength Positionally i will laugh at you first off Computers are Tactically 2500+ Computers have scored rating performances of over 2500 for years and Deep Thought Being the first to get 2745 a GM norm so Congrats to Chess Tiger for being the few but play against humans in Linars and we will see how Tactically you can't do anything if their aren't any tactics it probably sounds like i am babbling i am truely sorry it's just that people automatically think oh it beats these players and it is a GM Tactically yes all around computers are NOT GM strength for proof take all positional type test suites and sit there for awhile because there is no way your program is solving many of them I personally can tell you i have suites that aren't solved by Fritz 6 in 30 minutes and even some tactical ones that take over an hour . Besides a 2545 or two has knocked off Rebel and Fritz both of which made yep you guessed it positional errors like in the game sherbakov vs rebel where rebel played e5 blocking in it's bishop just like deep blue so if you want a good idea take this 2700 performance (Tactical) and use 2100 for Positional add them up and divide by two there's your answer not exact but it's a good idea
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.