Author: odell hall
Date: 23:52:42 07/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2001 at 20:36:38, Slater Wold wrote: >On July 06, 2001 at 20:27:16, odell hall wrote: > >>On July 06, 2001 at 20:16:46, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>On July 06, 2001 at 20:10:49, Joshua Lee wrote: >>> >>>>How strong are Computers at Positional Play? >>> >>>I think that I'm better (DWZ 2099, German Elo)! >>> >>>Eduard >> >> You may be stronger positionally, but it means absolutely nothing if you cannot >>defeat the machine. I do believe the object of chess is to win the gazme? > >I take it you have not seen Eduard's posts where he has defeated many commercial >programs more than once. > >Everyone knows, if chess programs were positional skilled as they are tactical, >we probably wouldn't have the "are computers GM strength" questions flying >around here all the time. > >And that is how Eduard consistantly defeats them, gets them into a position were >it is too difficult for them to figure out what's REALLY going on. > > >Slate Sorry Slate I am too skeptical to take some one's word for it, if the game was not played in public i don't believe it. Anyone can say they beat a program, how can i verify that it is true?? It's funny you are always hearing people say they beat this or that program, yet in all the public games Grandmaster and international masters are losing, even on icc the computers when most of the time.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.