Author: martin fierz
Date: 00:24:28 07/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2001 at 17:41:46, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On July 06, 2001 at 09:24:18, martin fierz wrote: > >>On July 06, 2001 at 09:07:59, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >> >>>On July 06, 2001 at 07:38:14, martin fierz wrote: >>> >>>>On July 06, 2001 at 07:23:03, john c cook wrote: >>>> >>>>>i could not belive how good deep junior play vs GM dreev so to say that it >>>>>nothing i can not belive anything you say about computer chess because you >>>>>belive they can not play real chess >>>> >>>>a single game hardly ever says anything. can we at least agree on this? it has >>>>nothing to do with computer chess or even chess, this is purely a question of >>>>statistics! >>>> >>>>cheers >>>> martin >>> >>>How long is it going to be "one game" we have now seen a string of games that is >>>testemony to the fact that computers/programs can perform at the highest level, >>>these are the statistics so far! >>> >>>Regards >>>Jonas >> >>john was referring to a single game of deep junior against dreev. with this as >>evidence, he will not believe anything i say about computer chess. he was >>referring to "one game", not me ;-) >> >>cheers >> martin > >If you read your response again you will see that the "a single game hardly ever >says anything" argument was made by you! > >Regards >Jonas right, of course i was the first one to say 'a single game' in this thread. but john was referring to the game dreev-deep junior. a single game. he didnt say it that way, but that is what he was referring to. cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.