Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computers are Tactically as Strong as GMs?

Author: David Blackman

Date: 07:39:25 07/07/01

Go up one level in this thread


On July 06, 2001 at 20:10:03, Joshua Lee wrote:

>Computers are Tactically as Strong as GMs?

You have to realise that for a GM it is very hard to seperate tactics from other
aspects such as positional play, endgame play, and swindles. In a difficult
tactical position, a GM, especially if in time trouble, will not try to
calculate every line to evaluate what is the best move. Instead they rely on
their positional understanding of the kind of position, to decide what moves are
likely to work, then calculate just a few sample lines to see how they turn out
and confirm their positional judgement, then in the end they make an educated
guess based on all this.

So it is often the case that a GM can make a correct move without fully
understanding all the tactical sequences of moves from the position. (They can
also totally stuff up where a computer could instantly make the right move. Look
at some of the GM games that are hidden inside the tournament bulletins, rather
than the ones that make lead articles in the magazines.)

So if you get a sharp position that has positional motifs that the GM is
reasonably familiar with, the GM will sometimes find the right move where a
computer will fail to in any reasonable time.

On the other hand, in a mixed up position where all that matters is shear
calculating power because there are no obvious positional ideas, the computer
will find the right move (or a good enough move) more often than a GM.

My feeling is that most of the top programs today have a slight edge in tactics
against most GMs. There are exceptional positions where the GMs get it right and
the computers get it wrong. There are also just a few GMs who are probably
similar strength (or maybe even better) than the top programs tactically. (This
doesn't count Deep Blue, which is (a) retired, (b) of unknown strength really,
and (c) quite likely a real tactical monster.)

And of course, in many games there are important positions which are not about
tactics at all.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.