Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: DJ7 with quite some problems

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 08:19:12 07/07/01

Go up one level in this thread


On July 07, 2001 at 09:44:08, Martin Müller wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>It is quite sad to see a famous program as DJ7 to loose that _way_. Not the loss
>is important. But how it looses. The evalutaion differed up to 3 or more pawns
>against several reputated programs. It makes me think that the evaluation of the
>program is not quite correct. Just see that:
>
>{\rtf1\ansi\deff0{\fonttbl{\f0\froman FigurineCB AriesSP;}{\f1\fnil
>DiagramTTFritz;}}{\info{\author
>Müller,Martin}{\creatim\yr2001\mo7\dy7\hr15\min38}}\fs20 {\pard \ql {\b \fs24
>(455) Deep Shredder,G - Deep Junior 7 [E48]\par}{\plain \fs20 Level=Blitz:60'.
>Z\'FCrich, 07.07.2001\par}}{\qj {\b {\plain \fs20  716MB, j7book.ctg. LINKS
> }1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 c5 5.Bd3 Nc6 6.Nge2 cxd4 7.exd4 d5 8.cxd5 Nxd5
>9.0\'960 0\'960 10.Nxd5 Qxd5 11.a3 Be7 12.Be3 Rd8 13.Nc3 Qd7 {\plain \fs20
>0.10/16  2:34  }14.Qc2 Nxd4 {\plain \fs20  0.33/18  1:47  }15.Bxh7+ Kh8 {\plain
>\fs20  0.37/19  1:58  }16.Bxd4 Qxd4 {\plain \fs20  0.48/17  51  }17.Rad1 Qh4
>{\plain \fs20  0.43/17  2:10  }18.Be4 Bd7 {\plain \fs20  0.52/17  2:16  }19.Rd3
>e5 {\plain \fs20  0.00/17  5  }20.Bxb7 Rab8 {\plain \fs20  0.36/15  49  }21.Be4
>g6 {\plain \fs20  0.39/16  1:25  }22.b4 Be6 {\plain \fs20  0.44/16  2:00
>}23.Nd5 Bd6 {\plain \fs20  0.52/14  1:08  }24.Rfd1 Rdc8 {\plain \fs20  0.57/16
>2:34  }25.Qe2 Kg7 {\plain \fs20  0.72/16  1:50  }26.g3 Qh8 {\plain \fs20
>0.87/16  40  }27.Qe3 Bg4 {\plain \fs20  1.08/16  3:24  }28.Re1 Bh3 {\plain \fs20
> 1.24/17  1:39  }29.Qxa7 Qf8 {\plain \fs20  1.30/17  1:52  }30.Qe3 Rd8 {\plain
>\fs20  1.29/16  1:55  }31.Red1 Qe8 {\plain \fs20  1.30/16  1:30  }32.Bf3 Qe6
>{\plain \fs20  1.40/16  55  }33.Nc3 Bc7 {\plain \fs20  1.11/16  48  }34.Rxd8
>Bxd8 {\plain \fs20  0.00/18  5  }35.Nd5 Qf5 {\plain \fs20  1.37/18  2:36  }36.a4
>Bg5 {\plain \fs20  1.42/17  2:34  }37.Qe2 Rc8 {\plain \fs20  1.50/17  1:01
>}38.a5 Rc2 {\plain \fs20  1.98/18  5  }39.Ne3 Bxe3 {\plain \fs20  0.00/19  5
>}40.Qxe3 Ra2 {\plain \fs20  0.00/18  5  }41.Bd5 Ra4 {\plain \fs20  0.00/18  5
>}42.Qc3 Qh5 {\plain \fs20  2.07/16  10  }43.Re1 Qf5 {\plain \fs20  0.00/18  6
>}44.Bb3 Ra3 {\plain \fs20  2.27/17  41  }45.Qb2 Qf3 {\plain \fs20  2.40/18  3:06
> }46.Qxe5+ Qf6 {\plain \fs20  #1/20  5  }47.Qxf6+ Kxf6 {\plain \fs20  #1/21  6
>}48.Bd5 Bd7 {\plain \fs20  2.48/21  5  }49.f4 Bb5 {\plain \fs20  2.32/17  30
>}50.Rc1 Ke7 {\plain \fs20  2.68/18  26  }51.Kf2 Ra4 {\plain \fs20  2.37/17  43
>}52.Re1+ Kf6 {\plain \fs20  2.37/18  44  }53.Rb1 Ke7 {\plain \fs20  0.00/21  5
>}54.Ke3 f6 {\plain \fs20  2.69/18  1:27  }55.Kd4 Kd6 {\plain \fs20  2.80/21  5
>}56.Bf7 g5 {\plain \fs20  2.62/17  33  }57.h4 gxh4 {\plain \fs20  2.62/16  29
>}58.gxh4 Ra3 {\plain \fs20  0.00/21  5  }59.Bb3 Bd7 {\plain \fs20  0.00/21  5
>}60.h5 Bf5 {\plain \fs20  3.19/21  5  }61.Rb2 Kc7 {\plain \fs20  0.00/20  5
>}62.h6 Kb8 {\plain \fs20  3.54/18  1:00  }63.Bd5 Kc7 {\plain \fs20  0.00/19  5
>}64.Rb3 Ra1 {\plain \fs20  0.00/21  5  }65.Rc3+ Kb8{\plain \fs20  4.40/18  3 }
>1\'960}\par \par}\par}
>
>Deep Shredder,G - Deep Junior 7 [E48]
>Level=Blitz:60'.  Zürich, 07.07.2001
>
> 716MB, j7book.ctg. LINKS
> 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 c5 5.Bd3 Nc6 6.Nge2 cxd4 7.exd4 d5 8.cxd5 Nxd5
>9.0-0 0-0 10.Nxd5 Qxd5 11.a3 Be7 12.Be3 Rd8 13.Nc3 Qd7  0.10/16  2:34  14.Qc2
>Nxd4  0.33/18  1:47  15.Bxh7+ Kh8  0.37/19  1:58  16.Bxd4 Qxd4  0.48/17  51
>17.Rad1 Qh4  0.43/17  2:10  18.Be4 Bd7  0.52/17  2:16  19.Rd3 e5  0.00/17  5
>20.Bxb7 Rab8  0.36/15  49  21.Be4 g6  0.39/16  1:25  22.b4 Be6  0.44/16  2:00
>23.Nd5 Bd6  0.52/14  1:08  24.Rfd1 Rdc8  0.57/16  2:34  25.Qe2 Kg7  0.72/16
>1:50  26.g3 Qh8  0.87/16  40  27.Qe3 Bg4  1.08/16  3:24  28.Re1 Bh3  1.24/17
>1:39  29.Qxa7 Qf8  1.30/17  1:52  30.Qe3 Rd8  1.29/16  1:55  31.Red1 Qe8
>1.30/16  1:30  32.Bf3 Qe6  1.40/16  55  33.Nc3 Bc7  1.11/16  48  34.Rxd8 Bxd8
>0.00/18  5  35.Nd5 Qf5  1.37/18  2:36  36.a4 Bg5  1.42/17  2:34  37.Qe2 Rc8
>1.50/17  1:01  38.a5 Rc2  1.98/18  5  39.Ne3 Bxe3  0.00/19  5  40.Qxe3 Ra2
>0.00/18  5  41.Bd5 Ra4  0.00/18  5  42.Qc3 Qh5  2.07/16  10  43.Re1 Qf5  0.00/18
> 6  44.Bb3 Ra3  2.27/17  41  45.Qb2 Qf3  2.40/18  3:06  46.Qxe5+ Qf6  #1/20  5
>47.Qxf6+ Kxf6  #1/21  6  48.Bd5 Bd7  2.48/21  5  49.f4 Bb5  2.32/17  30  50.Rc1
>Ke7  2.68/18  26  51.Kf2 Ra4  2.37/17  43  52.Re1+ Kf6  2.37/18  44  53.Rb1 Ke7
>0.00/21  5  54.Ke3 f6  2.69/18  1:27  55.Kd4 Kd6  2.80/21  5  56.Bf7 g5  2.62/17
> 33  57.h4 gxh4  2.62/16  29  58.gxh4 Ra3  0.00/21  5  59.Bb3 Bd7  0.00/21  5
>60.h5 Bf5  3.19/21  5  61.Rb2 Kc7  0.00/20  5  62.h6 Kb8  3.54/18  1:00  63.Bd5
>Kc7  0.00/19  5  64.Rb3 Ra1  0.00/21  5  65.Rc3+ Kb8 4.40/18  3  1-0
>
>Or
>
>Century 3 viz Deep Junior 7
>
>1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 c5 5.Bd3 Nc6 6.Ng-e2 cxd4 7.exd4 d5 8.cxd5 Nxd5
>9.O-O O-O 10.Nxd5 Qxd5 11.a3 Be7 12.Be3 Rd8 13.Nc3 Qd7 14.Qc2 Nxd4 15.Bxh7+ Kh8
>16.Bxd4 Qxd4 17.Ra-d1 Qh4 18.Be4 Bd7 19.Rd3 e5 20.Bxb7 Ra-b8 21.Be4 g6 22.b4 Be6
>23.Nd5 Bd6 24.Rf-d1 Rd-c8 25.Qe2 Kg7 26.g3 Qh8 27.Qe3 Bg4 28.Re1 Bh3 29.Qxa7 Qf8
>30.Qe3 Rc-d8 31.Re-d1 Qe8 32.Bf3 Qe6 33.Nc3 Bc7 34.Rd3xd8 Bxd8 35.Nd5 Qf5 36.a4
>Bg5 37.Qe2 Rc8 38.a5 Rc2 39.Ne3 Bxe3 40.Qxe3 Ra2 41.Bd5 Ra4 42.Qc3 Qh5 43.Re1
>Qf5 44.Bb3 Ra3 45.Qb2 Qf3 46.Qxe5+ Qf6 47.Qxf6+ Kxf6 48.Bd5 Bd7 49.f4 Bb5 50.Rc1
>Ke7 51.Kf2 Ra4 52.Re1+ Kf6 53.Rb1 Ke7 54.Ke3 f6 55.Kd4 Kd6 56.Bf7 g5 57.h4 gxh4
>58.gxh4 Ra3 59.Bb3 Bd7 60.h5 Bf5 61.Rb2 Kc7 62.h6 Kb8 63.Bd5 Kc7 64.Rb3 Ra1
>65.Rc3+ Kb8 66.Rc6 Resigns
>
>
>Century 3 on a mûch slower 1 processor computer.
>
>
>DJ7 does not see the problems it seems. What is wrong with DJ7?
>
>Regards
>Martin

I do not know what is wrong with Deep Junior7 and I guess that Junior7 is better
than Deep Junior7.

I saw  Junior7 beating Deep Fritz 41-38 in 1 hour per game engine-engine game
in this club.

I did not see this kind of strange evaluation of 0.00 in positions like the
following position in Junior7's games

[D]8/2k5/5p1P/P2B1b2/1P1K1P2/rR6/8/8 b - - 0 1

It has to be a bug.

I do not know if the bug is in the static evaluation or in the updating of some
variables between moves.

I guess that Deep Junior7 was not tested enough because most buyers buy Junior7
and not Deep Junior7.

I did not try the game with Junior7 but I will be surprised if I see 0.00 in
that positions even if I replay the moves of the game.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.