Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ChessTiger 4 Wins – Grandmasters 4 Losses

Author: Daniel Clausen

Date: 09:32:39 07/07/01

Go up one level in this thread


Hi

On July 07, 2001 at 09:50:39, Mark Young wrote:

>In an incredible achievement ChessTiger defeated all 4 Grandmasters in the IV
>República Argentina International Chess Tournament. ChessTiger also chalked up
>the unbelievable TPR of 2788 and going undefeated in the tournament.
>
>So much for computers not being able to cope with the positional understanding
>of Grandmasters. Either tactics are more important in chess then positional
>understanding, or computers understand positional play better then we give them
>credit.

Do we really have to discuss the same subject over and over again? Why can't you
guys stop with this? You (among others) think the comps are GM-strength
(although nobody seems to care to come up with a definition). Bob (among others)
think they're not. Different people, different opinion. So what?
Let's stop this?

Regards,

Sargon



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.